Showing posts with label ConDem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ConDem. Show all posts

Saturday, 18 April 2015

Music to end the condem chaos coalition...




On this weeks podcast, Colin Fox on the launch of the SSP manifesto this week, Don Mackeen on the upcoming American presidential election, podcaster Michael Greenwell in the first of a series of interviews he is doing for the SSP, Katie Bonnar on the dreadful kidnapping of young women by Boko Haram in Nigeria, Stephanie Rolls on the Scottish service tax and  Calum Martin on the rebellion of 1820.
Music from:
Get in touch with us via the website www.scottishsocialistparty.org or email me directneilwscott@hotmail.com we want to know your views on our policies, the podcast and I am wanting to hear from unsigned and independent bands who would like to have their music played on Scotlands most popular socialist podcast.  

Sunday, 13 May 2012

Coalition in crisis: kick them out!

By Richie Venton, SSP national workplace organiser


photo:  John Lanigan

 
As the council election caravan moves on, working class people continue to face appalling cuts to their living standards; they are left with no option but to 'struggle or starve'.

The chief architects of the cuts to pensions, wages, benefits and community facilities were hammered in the council elections. The Tories lost over 400 councillors, in a tidal wave of revulsion at their cuts and their sleaze.
Their junior partners in crime fared even worse at the hands of a furious population, many of whom feel cheated and betrayed by the LibDems. The carnage included the loss of 80 out of 151 LibDem councillors in Scotland.

Despite the SSP vote suffering from the crushing squeeze between the two tribes of Labour and SNP going to war, enhanced by the brutal, self-fulfilling media lie that this was a two-horse race, we beat the LibDem party of government in many of the seats we contested! Mind you, so did an Edinburgh 'penguin'!

No mandate to rule and ruin
The millionaires' Coalition has even less of a mandate for their eye-watering butchery to jobs, services and incomes than they had before May 3rd. That applies with special force in Scotland, where they have plummeted to the status of fringe parties, mostly isolated to a few rural pockets in the Borders and South Ayrshire in the case of the Tories. 

The Westminster butchers are in deep disarray, drowning in a sea of sleaze around the Murdoch scandal and the descent of the economy into a 'double-dip' recession for the first time since 1975 - and the longest economic depression in decades.

With that background, Cameron, Clegg & Co are all the more ruthless in their desire to make working class people pay for the crisis, whilst those who perpetrated some of the worst cuts are wallowing in wealth. 
But they are weak, vulnerable and divided, with right-wing Tories decrying the presence of the LibDems, and even a Tory MP publicly sneering at Cameron and Clegg as "two posh boys who don't know the price of milk" - an assessment that finds massive resonance amongst those at the receiving end of their upper-class callousness.

Slasher Hutton on £100,000 a day!
Millions of public sector workers have had their first taste of increased chunks of their wages being deducted as pension contributions last month - with a lot worse to come next year and the year after unless the government is defeated by united action.

Meantime, Labour Lord John Hutton - 'Slasher' Hutton to those suffering the assault on six million public sector workers' pensions that he was chief author of under the previous Labour government - has landed a £100,000 a day job as chair of the part-privatised civil service outfit, MyCSP.

68 is too late!
Opinion polls confirm massive opposition to the later retirement age being pushed through, which means every female worker under 36 faces an extra 8 years in work before she can get a state pension, and every male worker in that age-group an extra 3 years. 

Whilst over one third (36 per cent) of families currently rely on grandparents for child-minding, and councils jack up the cost of council nursery places as part of the cuts agenda, the government wants to force millions to work longer, denying them a healthy retirement and robbing them of time with their grandchildren. 

A child born today will have to work well into their late 70s if Coalition plans are not derailed by strikes, protests and civil disobedience.

Even Tory voters are rebelling against this abomination of a plan! A recent YouGov poll found 53 per cent of Tory voters against raising the retirement age, with 35 per cent of them criticising the fact it will lead to even fewer job opportunities for young people. 

Across the board, 62 per cent of people oppose making workers work longer for less on retirement - despite an incredible 38 per cent of those polled not even being aware of the planned delay in retirement!

This country is poised to have the latest state retirement age in Europe, as well as some of the lowest wages, longest working week and poorest holiday entitlements.

The moneyed class and their governments try to drag us out of recession by preaching the gospel "shop 'til you drop" - whilst slashing workers' spending power! 

Now they want us to literally "work 'til you drop" - to ensure the CEOs of big private businesses can continue to wallow in their current average pensions of £175,000 a year.

M10 strike rekindles the fires of resistance
The strike of up to half a million public sector workers on 10 May - including PCS, UNITE, UCU and RMT members in the civil service, health, MoD and education - should be the flame to re-ignite the fires of resistance that too many trade union leaders have tried to dampen since the magnificent strike of two million on 30 November. 

These unions plan further coordinated action in late June. PCS is also taking industrial action in specific departments and sectors, alongside a generalised overtime ban from now until late June. And they have raised the call for a united demo against the cuts this side of the summer.

Demand an immediate mass demo
One of the trade union 'leaders' who did most to stall the momentum after N30 is UNISON's Dave Prentis. Now, in an attempt to save face amongst members increasingly angry at being 'sold a pup' by Prentis, he has called for a mass trade union-led demo in the autumn. 

Why wait that long? Active members of every union should argue for a huge Saturday demo over the next couple of months, demanding that either the STUC call it in Scotland or a 'coalition of the willing trade unions' do so. 

Not instead of a broader, bigger strike in June, but in addition to it, as a means of reaching out to workers in local government, education and the private sector who are not part of the M10 strike. Not just on pensions, but on other cuts and attacks on rights, jobs and benefits.

Coalition can be beaten
The recent council elections saw hundreds of thousands voting either SNP or Labour as a means of punishing the Westminster cuts Coalition. They won votes primarily because they are not the Coalition! 

The electoral decimation of the chief architects of cuts should be the green light for the trade unions to unite with community groups and socialists in decisive, early action to drive the crisis-ridden Coalition back further. They can be beaten. They can be driven out of office.

The response on the streets to the SSP's central message 'no cuts, tax the rich' was infinitely larger than the votes cast for our uncompromising socialist case, partly because people were browbeaten with the media message of a 'two-horse race', partly because Labour and the SNP lied through their teeth with talk of creating jobs, and people often gave one of the 'big two' their first two votes, giving the SSP third or fourth preference. 

Pound new councils with demands to reverse the cuts
In several councils, the biggest party has changed from one to the other, so the trade union movement and community organisations should join with socialists in pounding these councillors with demands to reverse the cuts of their predecessors - or stand exposed as fakers gaining votes under false pretences, engaged in a cynical exercise of shuffling deckchairs on the Titanic. Now is the time to besiege them with such demands, fresh on the heels of them taking office.

Capitalism doesn't work
The battle against cuts, both at local council level and nationally on the pensions issue, is critical in the broader resistance to the systematic dismantling of workers' rights, benefits and frontline services gained by past generations through struggle. 

Plans to usher in regional pay; slash the right to challenge unfair dismissal from work; curtail the right to have functioning union shop stewards to stand up for members; and the core aim of rampant privatisation of what remains of public property - all these and more are the inevitable product of a capitalist system that is based on exploitation for profit, that simply doesn't work, that condemns a whole generation to permanent mass unemployment, and that seeks to slaughter working class conditions in defence of profit margins and privileges for the obscenely rich minority.

Capitalism means cuts, mass unemployment and mounting poverty from the cradle to the grave. 
Socialism - based on taxation of the rich, wealth redistribution and democratic public ownership - is the only means of escaping 'eternal austerity'. 

Those who strike back in May have an important part to play in building a future worthy of the name - a socialist future based on people, not profit.

Monday, 2 April 2012

State monitoring of YOUR emails...

Jo Swinson was on TV last night defending the Governments want to monitor your emails, Facebook, Twitter, web history etc.  This is a complete flip from her stance back in 2009 when she hadn't tasted power.

Please email Jo Swinson and David Cameron and let them know you feel this is an infringement of your civil liberties.

David Cameron's private email - privateoffice@no10.x.gsi.gov.uk


Contact Jo Swinson - http://www.writetothem.com/

Titanic 2 "The ConDemNation"

by Campsie SSP member, Neil Scott



On April 12 1912, the Titanic sank. The "unsinkable sinking" and God's wrath on men getting above their station are held as reasons for the lingering fascination behind this event, but I feel the exposure of the values and the class system that prevented social mobility of Victorian/Edwardian Britain a much more important factor. If there was a message from any God, it must have been the disgust of the vilification and condemnation of a "subspecies" of the poor. The disgusting statistics of Third Class dead and stories of people being kept away from the lifeboats exposed the truth of "our betters." I feel what happened in 1912 serves as a warning as massive inequality seems to be the order of Tory Britain in 2012.


Read the rest of this article on the Huffington Post HERE

Saturday, 25 February 2012

False Economy

Although I have issues with the word, "growth" where the economy is concerned, this video tells the truth about who caused the economic crisis - and who is suffering because of it.

Why cuts are the wrong cure from False Economy on Vimeo.

Thursday, 28 July 2011

Swinson- increasingly divorced from realities of living in East Dunbartonshire

I have been finding our local LibDem/ConDem/Tory MP, Jo Swinson's "e-consultations" and online presence are becoming less and less about her constituency, and more and more about her want to make an impact with the "federal party" she is part of, and building a CV for the inevitable crash of the Lib Dems.


  Lately, Swinson has replied to me via email to pronounce her support of Nuclear Weapons and "an alternative" to Trident being the imperative - 


"A non-nuclear defence is not currently a viable option and the EDM does not recognise that we continue to live in an uncertain, unpredictable world where proliferation of nuclear weapons is still a priority for some countries. We also cannot assume that current nuclear states will remain stable and pose no threat to our country and its interests. The risk may be low, but so long as a risk exists, we cannot leave ourselves vulnerable and so some minimal deterrent is needed."


I would like to know what this threat she is hinting at is - and why reacting to this threat with a nuclear deterrent is a necessary and positive response.  Would we really attack another country - killing many innocent families, children and workers - if some deranged terrorist or dictator launched an attack on us?  


If you would like a copy of her response to my request for her to sign EDM 1924 regarding the Trident Review, please email me at eastdunbartonshiressp@hotmail.co.uk 


Anyway, her latest e-consultation asks the question, 


"Do you agree that the government should invest in high speed rail between London and the north of England?"

I felt this question was not only far removed from her "localism" campaign to be elected in the past two General Elections, but also shows her as a career politician, making sure of her place in the decimated LibDem Party after the next General Election (which, the way this coalition are going, could be sooner rather than later).  Positioning herself as Vince Cables PPS will, perhaps after the election give her some sort of political position or at least a great entry in her CV.  

Remember - between her and her MP husband, their family income is over £120,000 a year - not bad for two career politicians who have never had to struggle.  The least she could do is fight for working families and poorly paid people in her own constituency.  East Dunbartonshire is a place where we are reliant on public sector jobs - teachers, nurses, doctors and other "civil servants" commute daily to Glasgow and other cities and large towns for a diminishing return thanks to the VAT increases, increase in transport costs, increase in food prices and increases in fuel prices to name a few - alongside frozen wages.  The median wage is £21,000 - far removed from her wage of over £64,700 plus allowances, including travel.  How many East Dunbartonshire working people get transport allowances into Glasgow or Edinburgh or elsewhere?  How many East Dunbartonshire people get their subscription the the Bearsden Milngavie Herald as a work expense?  Or their mobile phone bill paid?  As a teacher, I am in contact with my Head Teacher and other colleagues about work quite a lot - perhaps Jo should fight for ALL workers to have their mobile phone, travel to work and subscription to a local paper paid for through company expenses?

Swinson is increasingly being seen as the well off young person who has never had to work or struggle for her income she is.  And increasingly as someone divorced from the present day hard realities of living in East Dunbartonshire. 

This is my reply to her current anglo-centric consultation:
A fully integrated, updated public transport system is vital to our country - and indeed to East Dunbartonshire, which this question, and more and more of your "consultations" seem to forget about.

As the economy slumps and as more and more of your constituents have less and less money to help the economy grow due to the Lib Dem policy of support for the Tory plans to make the poor and working pay for the crisis of capital created by millionaires and billionaires, a free public transport system for the huge amount of commuters from East Dunbartonshire would be a policy that would not only help poor and working families financially; it would be a boost to the local economy as people would be left with more of a disposable income.  It would also help clear our streets from  the curse of the car (and ensure the predicted one hour travel time from Milngavie to Canniesburn DOES NOT happen post-Kilmardinny development).

Our policy of Free Public Transport - a policy that has been successful in other parts of the world in boosting economies and in creating a cleaner environment, can be found here along with links to articles in the Herald praising this "audacious" plan.  

Neil Scott
Organiser, Campsie Socialists.


Open Letter to Swinson HERE
Criticism of her so called feminism HERE

Monday, 6 June 2011

The Deepbone Roundabout- keep Swinson away.

Letter to Bearsden Milngavie Herald


It is really good to see the construction of the new roundabout at the Duntocher Road / Baljaffray Road intersection. This will undoubtedly save lives and stop the risk taking of motorists pulling out on to the Duntocher Road.

When I saw this was given the go ahead I was reminded of the locally filmed “Burnistoun” comedy series and the single issue politician who was successfully elected to get rid of the traffic lights on the Deep bone Roundabout (see below for video ) and was also reminded of the single issue politician who represents our constituency in Westminster, and through a hung Parliament has become an apologist for the Tories, Jo Swinson.




Swinson was elected on the single issue that she was not the Labour Party, nor was she a member of the Tory party. How wrong we were.

I look around East Dunbartonshire and see the changes electing such a careerist politician to Westminster has imposed upon us. Her unfaltering support for the ConDem Tory led government and deep, rapid cuts aimed at working people have led to a huge proportion of our young people without hope of work after training as teaching assistants, teachers, nurses, doctors etc. Her proudest moment seems to have been the support for a policy that does not, thank goodness, even effect East Dunbartonshire and Scotland, ie. the imposition of huge fees to young people wanting to participate and add to our economy through educating themselves at Universities in England.

In her current position as Parliamentary Private Secretary to Vince Cable, she has now foisted the blame for the UK’s stagnant economy on to workers who are trying to defend their ever decreasing income and in fact their jobs, rather than on the banks and the billionaires who caused the economic crisis in the first place. Cable and Swinson and the rest of the ConDems have, regardless of their empty rhetoric , failed completely in taking on the banks and their bonus culture and the structural aspects of capitalism that will lead to further crisis, and further disaster for working people, in the future. Instead, the workers and their children growing up in East Dunbartonshire are bearing the brunt of the cuts – Swinson, Cable, Clegg and Cameron have turned socialism on its head and instead of the people they represent gaining through the profits of these institutions, the people of East Dunbartonshire, Scotland and the UK have had the DEPT shared out, whilst the bankers enjoy their bonuses and the oil and gas profiteers steal our resources (and charge us the highest prices in Europe for what is produced in our country).

Swinson, with her £60k+ salary and expenses is so far removed from the struggles of ordinary people in East Dunbartonshire, one can imagine her muttering under her breath the thatcherite nonsense, "There is no such thing as society," adding, "only workers who will pay for the neo-capitalist destruction of our economy."

Unfortunately, Swinson has another four years to be an apologist for a Tory led Government that is draining Scotland and East Dunbartonshire of its resources and young people (who undoubtedly will leave our shores to find work in countries that value the skills they have learned).

A single issue politician or a politician without a single issue?
I believe the time to start fighting for a local candidate who sees far beyond the £60k+ pay packet and huge expenses Swinson can claim, is now. I propose those of us in East Dunbartonshire who share a vision of a better world for our children and not more of the same, should come together and find a candidate we can support that will oust the Liberal Democrats from East Dunbartonshire AND ensure the Tories get the message that their extreme capitalism is not welcome here. A candidate who will fight for East Dunbartonshire and for an independent Scotland and a candidate who will not be seduced by the money and self aggrandizement the title of MP has brought to Jo. A candidate who will work for us on an average workers wage.

Oh, and I hope when this new Roundabout is opened, Swinson is not asked to cut the ribbon. The Burnistoun writers and performers have added much more to the Bearsden/ Milngavie/ East Dunbartonshire economy than Swinson has by far. Ask them.

Neil Scott
SSP Organiser, www.campsiesocialists.com

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

Demonstrate against the cuts and this vicious Tory and Liberal Democrat government!


FIGHT THE CUTS ! 


DEMONSTRATE IN EDINBURGH, SATURDAY OCTOBER 23RD!



Called by the Scottish Trades 
Union Congress
11.00 am: Assemble East Market 
Street Edinburgh
11.30am: March off
  12.30 pm: Rally Ross Bandstand

READ RAPHIE DE SANTOS (LEFTBANKER) on George Osborne's "spending Review" HERE

Sunday, 19 September 2010

SSP Campsie Radio - episode 2!

New episode of the SSP Campsie podcast HERE

Contact us email – eastdunbartonshiressp@hotmail.co.uk , twitter – @sspcampsie or leave a message by phoning or texting– 075 413 925 22 – your standard charges apply!

Thursday, 16 September 2010

Guest blogger: FIGHTING THE CUTS: fine words and defiant deeds

By Richie Venton, SSP national workplace organiser 14 Sept 2010





The fiery speeches at the TUC congress in Manchester dominated the media headlines. People at work talked about the prospect of widespread strikes. Women at the school gates picking up primary kids commented “we’re all going to be out on strike”. Many workers relished the idea of action, together. And the very fact they had noticed the TUC debate on the ConDem cuts is a reminder of the potential power of the trade unions to give a lead. That potential now needs to be tapped into through action, not just fiery speeches.
The devastation looming towards communities and workforces – both public- and private-sector –is beginning to sink into the minds of millions. In recent days, a series of hard-hitting facts and studies have exposed the realities we face, unless a mighty movement of rallies, demonstrations and ultimately coordinated strikes (alongside civil disobedience) is built to halt the Millionaires’ Cabinet.

Poorest hit hardest
The planned slaughter will hit the poorest hardest – and ratchet up the obscene levels of inequality still further. The poorest 10 per cent of the population will lose 13 times more by the cuts than the richest 10 per cent.
Pensioners, low-paid families, the sick and unemployed will pay a terrible price for a crisis created by the bankers and billionaires. Meantime profits, perks and downright pilfering of public funds by top bankers, bosses and bureaucrats in quangos and the public sector run riot.

As the TUC warned, a million jobs could be wiped out if the Tory-LibDem butchers get their way. Around 72 per cent of the cuts will be borne by women, who make up 65per cent of public sector workers. Young people will be hammered – with a million under-24s already on the scrapheap.

And the catastrophic loss of 10,000 Scottish jobs threatened in the shipyards as a result of Defence cuts is a harsh reminder that public sector cuts mean private sector redundancies too.

Shift in opinion
Since the day they were NOT elected, the Twin Tories have bombarded the population with daily propaganda that the cuts are necessary, unavoidable, and therefore inevitable – all for our own good! That makes it all the more remarkable that in a Populous poll for the Times newspaper, 3 out of 4 people reject the ConDem cuts strategy. That is a powerful starting point for the trade union leaders - who have rightly lacerated “the demolition government” - to mount a serious, systematic campaign not just of explanation, but also of united action.

Winter of our discontent
The media headlines about the TUC debate on cuts painted lurid - and mostly viciously inaccurate - pictures of the 1979-80 ‘Winter of Discontent’. Their aim was to scare the living daylights out of the middle class, and even sections of workers, with images of rubbish piling up in the streets and the dead left unburied … to try and stop a wave of support for the “coordinated campaigning and industrial action” that the TUC motion calls for.

Unity is strength
We need a sober, serious examination of some key issues if we are to help defeat the wild axe-men of Westminster, not to mention the little axe-wielders in Holyrood and every one of Scotland’s 32 councils.
Unity against the cuts is critical. Tory Chancellor Osborne’s vicious, oily lie that “we are all in this together” is ripped apart by the facts, as reinforced by the various recent reports. The rich will get richer, the rest of us poorer, if they’re not stopped. Divisions between workers and those on benefits, private- and public-sector workers, pensioners and pupils, would be the death of any resistance – and the government are relentlessly trying to whip up such division.

So the motion agreed (with only the one Airline Pilates’ Association delegate against!) at the TUC, - which has 7 million trade unionists in its ranks - for coordinated campaigning and action is extremely welcome to all who care for the defence of a half-civilised society.

Trade union right-wing hesitate
But what did the central leaders of the TUC actually agree? Here there’s a distinction to be made between left and right union leaders.

The right-wing of the unions has stubbornly resisted calls for a demo in London on 23 October, days after the government’s Comprehensive Spending Review. They instead talk of a demo in March – when the cuts will be signed, sealed and delivered!

Contrary to the more colourful media headlines, they mainly want “coordination of a campaign” against the government’s arguments – and that in itself is a vital part of the battle; to build on the growing scepticism about the case for the cuts; to demolish it in the minds of millions, and critically to put forward a convincing economic alternative.

But the reluctance of the TUC right-wing to go for actual action, sooner rather than later – even initially in the form of a demo – should ring alarm bells for trade union members. It reveals an unhealthy reliance on “fine words” convincing the government to change tack, when we all know this ruthless capitalist coalition will only retreat if confronted by a mass rebellion.

Underlying this approach is a mind-boggling reliance on working for the return of a Labour government – as blurted out openly by Derek Simpson of the country’s biggest union, UNITE. As if we hadn’t just experienced 13 years of New Labour! And what are workers and communities meant to do for the next 4 years, ‘til the next election?

Poll tax rebellion
Top TUC leaders, like Brendan Barber, grab the headlines with talk of a rebellion like that against the poll tax – but then criticise calls for mass, peaceful civil disobedience against the cuts, from unions like the RMT. But it was precisely mass civil disobedience, a refusal to obey Thatcher’s laws and the collection of her government’s hated poll tax, which tossed it (and her) in the dustbin of history.

Unions and communities
One of the key differences however, is that the anti-poll tax rebellion, in the form of mass non-payment, was overwhelmingly community-based, whereas the unions are far more centrally positioned as organisers of 620,000 public sector workers in Scotland alone, when it comes to fighting the cuts.

Of course, community-rooted anti-cuts campaigns are critical, and will flourish as the material effects of the cuts impact fully on people. But the unions have a greater onus to give a lead, in united action, and in unison with community, pensioners’ and youth organisations, than they did in practice against the poll tax.

Green light for action
The TUC decision gives the green light to union branches, activists and left-led unions to put fine words into defiant deeds. As Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the PCS union, rightly told delegates at the TUC, none of the coordinated action and strikes will happen unless left-led unions and rank-and-file activists fight for it through their unions.

It is to their credit that the Scottish TUC (unlike the British TUC) has called a Scottish demo in Edinburgh on 23 October, as an immediate response to the government’s Spending Review on 20 October. That must be built as a mass show of united resistance, to boost the confidence of individual workers and workforces that we are “all in this together”, that we do not stand alone, that the massive latent power of working people will stand up in resistance.

Street Rally and STUC Demo
But building it requires more than a few circulars to union HQs. That is one of several reasons a big turnout to the Street Rally on 2 October in Glasgow, called by several union branches and community groups, is a critical contribution to building up the sense of strength through united action.

When some on the right of the trade unions baulk at calling strike action or committing to peaceful civil disobedience – as happened in the TUC debate – they often quote “the need to win over public opinion” Surely one of the best methods of doing that is to reach out to the public, show them action in the streets, spell out the case for no cuts on any job or service, as this Street Rally will seek to do?

And why wait ‘til after the Twin Tories – and in turn the Tartan Butchers in Holyrood – have set their cuts plans in stone in late October and November respectively?

United shows of opposition will help to rock a government that is far from strong, with glimpses and whispers of turmoil in the treacherous LibDems leaking out even before the storm hits them.

Defiance Budgets
And the political situation in Scotland is far different again, to the great advantage of workers and communities who seek to stop the cuts.

The Scottish government, and virtually all 32 councils, are run by parties other than the Tories and LibDems. If any of them are worth a carrot they would declare their refusal to pass on Westminster’s cuts, set No-Cuts Budgets, Defiance Budgets, and rally masses of workers and communities round a fight for the funds to retain every job, every penny in pay, and every single local service.

That is what SSP councillor Jim Bollan will demand and pursue in West Dunbartonshire council. It is what SSP members and others in local government unions will demand of councillors and MSPs. And it got a tremendous response at the Scottish UNISON anti-cuts conference, with UNISON general secretary Dave Prentis stating “I agree with every word that was said” when this proposal was put forward by NUJ president and SSP member Peter Murray.

Scottish Service Tax – an extra £1.6bn
Those union leaders – including STUC general secretary Graham Smith – who emphasise the need to win over public opinion - should also embrace the dynamite that is contained in the SSP’s proposed alternative to the hated, unfair Council Tax. As detailed in the last issue of the Voice, by scrapping the Council Tax and replacing it with a Scottish Service Tax, based on ability to pay, with rising bands of taxation on income, most Scots would pay less than now and yet an extra £1.6bn would be raised to fund council jobs and services.
One simple step, which the SNP government could legislate for through an emergency Bill, demolishes the excuses for cuts, and creates a surplus for services whilst also re-distributing some of the obscenely bloated incomes of the very rich to the rest of us.

Pound the politicians
Trade unionists, pensioners’ organisations, community activists, youth groups, women’s organisations – “all in this together” – should pound the SNP government with demands for a defiance budget rather than meek compliance with the Westminster slaughterhouse, alongside demands that they legislate for an income-based Scottish Service Tax – with reminders that they face an election in seven months. Likewise they should bombard councillors with demands for Defiance Budgets.

And the bigger the 2 October Street Rally, the bigger the 23 October STUC demo, the more confidence workers in the front line of assaults will gain in squaring up for future coordinated strike action against the cuts.

The enemy prepares for war!
The powers that be are not twiddling their thumbs in preparation for the widespread strikes that many commentators – and the STUC - have declared to be inevitable.
Tories and employers’ organisations are escalating their campaign to ban the right to strike in “essential services” – the same services which they brand non-essential, ‘back-office’ and dispensable when it comes to cutting them!

And the Police Superintendents’ Association president, Chief Superintendent Derek Barnett, has spelt out the reason his organization is calling for top coppers to be protected from the cuts: so the police can assist the government on the picket lines as social and industrial unrest rises with the savagery of the cuts planned.
A war has been declared on workers and their communities. Every concrete step to unite the opposition in action, not just words, is as important as a mass campaign of explanation of economic alternatives to any and all cuts.

The unions have a vital part to play, in full collaboration with those who rely on the services threatened. The fiery speeches at the TUC which captured the imagination of many now need to be matched by actions that put the SNP government and every local council on the spot – before it’s too late.

Monday, 2 August 2010

Review - The Truth About Empire

The Imperial Controversy: Challenging the Empire Apologists
By Andrew Murray, Manifesto Press
Foreword by George Galloway
152 pages, paperback £12.95

REVIEW BY ALEX MILLER


In the past decade or so, politicians, journalists and academics of various stripes have attempted to rehabilitate the notions of empire and imperialism. For example, in 2009 the then British PM Gordon Brown told the Daily Mail newspaper: “The days of Britain having to apologise for its colonial history are over. We should move forward. We should celebrate much of our past rather than apologise for it”. Likewise academic historians such as Niall Ferguson and Andrew Roberts have attempted to rewrite the history of the British Empire as something essentially beyond criticism. Ferguson has said, “I am fundamentally in favour of empire. Indeed, I believe that empire is more necessary in the 21st century than ever before”, while according to Roberts, “Imperialism is an idea whose time has come again”. Of course, these defences of historical imperialism serve merely as a prelude to a defence of the contemporary neo-colonialist projects promoted by the likes of former US president George. W. Bush and former British PM Tony Blair.

In this tightly argued book Andrew Murray, who is chair of the British Stop the War Coalition, takes on both historical imperialism and its contemporary neo-colonialist variant. Murray demonstrates that the British Empire, far from being the benign paternalistic force portrayed by the apologists, in fact delivered war, racism, famine, state terror and the suppression of self-determination and democracy on a scale comparable to that wreaked by Hitler’s Third Reich. For example, Murray points out that in the 18th century, there were 119 recorded wars involving the British Empire, and 72 such wars during Queen Victoria’s reign in the 19th. In the 20th century, major colonial conflicts occurred in South Africa, Kenya, Palestine, Malaya, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen and Ireland, and Murray also lists Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Ghana, Iran, India, Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Guatemala/Belize, as sites of British military involvement, not to mention the invasion of Bolshevik-led Russia after World War I and more recent interventions in Greece, Cyprus and the attack on Yugoslavia. Far from being a “Pax Britannica”, the British Empire waged endless war “both against rivals anxious to share the spoils, and, more persistently the peoples of the subject territories themselves”.

In addition to detailing the vast human cost of colonial war, Murray highlights the racism at the core of the imperial project and demonstrates what it meant in terms of lives lost due to man-made famine. For example, the mass starvation suffered by the indigenous Irish population in 1845-7 was not, as is commonly thought, the result of crop failure caused by potato blight. Murray points out that this crop failure was general across Europe, and that only in colonial Ireland did it lead to widespread starvation. Murray quotes the historian T.A. Jackson who asserted that “the amount of corn, cattle etc exported from Ireland in these years would have fed all those who hungered twice over”, and he identifies the “absolute priority given by the government in London to maintaining the social position of the landlord class in Ireland” as the reason for the mass starvation. As Murray notes, a concomitant of this was a racist attitude towards the Irish peasant, regarded as a subhuman to be condemned on the basis of class and religion as well as race. This was not an aberration in the history of the British Empire: “anything from 12 to 29 million people died from starvation across India in the famines largely caused by the structures of economic development imposed by the Raj and greatly exacerbated by laissez-faire dogma and official indifference”.

In addition to highlighting the Empire’s frequent resort to state violence and terror – often in the service of quashing local movements for elementary democracy and national self-determination – Murray also marshals overwhelming evidence “that imperialism, far from promoting economic advance, actually undeveloped the colonies”. In colony after colony, as a matter of deliberate policy “indigenous routes to industrialisation were blocked off, monocultural crop economies were imposed on the widest scale possible, forced labour utilised to maximise profit to capitalist investors and the entire course of development subordinated to the needs of the imperial power”.

Nor were endless war, famine, racism, state violence and the suppression of democracy features specifically of British imperialism: Murray summarises the “achievements” of Belgian, German, French, Dutch and Italian imperialism to show that they were comparable to those of the British.

Some interesting political facts emerge. For example, the famous Liberal Party leader William Gladstone is described by the Marxist writer R. Palme Dutt as supporting imperialism “under a rose-tinted eiderdown of pacific sentiments” – but “No sooner had he taken office than he continued and carried to new heights Tory imperialist foreign policy”. Gladstone’s duplicity is now taken a further step by his descendant as leader of the British Liberal-Democrats, Nick Clegg, who “opposed” the 2003 invasion of Iraq, but now serves as Deputy PM in a Conservative-led coalition fully committed to the ongoing neo-colonial occupation of Afghanistan. Moreover, although the Labour Party has contained over time many committed anti-imperialists, the pro-imperialist sentiments of Blair and Brown were apparently shared by the first Labour PM, Ramsey MacDonald, who advocated “socialist imperialism” based on “pride of race”.

Murray reserves his most scathing arguments for erstwhile “left-wing” journalists such as Christopher Hitchens and Nick Cohen (who described the British army in Iraq as “the armed wing of Amnesty International”). Murray very effectively takes to pieces their arguments in favour of the invasion of Iraq, and shows that the “peace, prosperity and democracy” promised for the Iraqis is as illusory as that cited by 19th century apologists for imperial involvement in India or Ireland.

Overall, Murray’s book provides an important and timely reminder that imperialism, whether in its historical or contemporary form, is in Galloway’s apt phrase “murder in the guise of a civilising mission”. In writing it, Murray has done a great service to the progressive and anti-war movement.

[Available from www.manifestopress.org.uk]

Tuesday, 27 July 2010

Robbing Peter to Pay Peter

by Ron Mackay

The media in general promotes the proposition that “everyone accepts that there have to be cuts”. Daily, for months we've been told cuts need to be made. These cuts are needed because of the colossal debt crisis. Who are we in debt to? To the banks? These same banks the Government has given a trillion £s to, to save them from collapsing? Recently the German Central Bank provided substantial sums of cash to commercial banks so they could meet the payments on the massive loans taken out the previous year from the very same Central Bank. This is so bizarre that Newsnight described it as a case of “robbing Peter to pay Peter.”

The current situation has been brought about by the capitalist system and the dangerous policies of the Condems and Labour only make matters worse. They are based on a gigantic confidence trick. Public spending did not cause the deficit. Expenditure on public spending, to-day is less than it was in 2007.

Many letters to the Glasgow Herald agree with columnist Ian Bell's statement that “No spending cuts are needed. None. Spending cuts are stupid, dangerous, and intended to stuff the throats of the rich. A fraud.” and further “The “crisis” as we are daily schooled to call it is an excuse--- for the largest transfer of wealth from the public realm to the private sphere since the self -invention of the pick-pocket”. This, in fact, is the latest move of the ultra-conservative elite to demolish the welfare state. They are intent on privatising everything from the cradle to the grave – education, health, pensions. This powerful elite, with its virtual monopoly control of the media, can manipulate a sufficient number of voters maintain control of parliament.

The way to halt and reverse these moves is for the trade unions and community to unite and organise mass protests. The sooner this is done the more effective it will be. Capitalism in its final throes is not going out with a whimper but has to be opposed by the organised masses. Bitter experience will help remove the media imposed blinkers from the eyes of the many. A determined leadership must lead the way to the only possible alternative – Socialism. The many who call themselves socialist need to become more active if change is to be achieved. Capitalism is so rotten it contaminates not only civilisation but the basis of all life the planet itself.

Friday, 9 July 2010

Shoppers in Kirkintilloch flock to sign SSP Alternative to Cuts petition



SSP Campsie branch were in Kirkintilloch today, talking to shoppers about the alternatives we have to the butchers budget set out by the Twin Tories.

Even though we were rained off after around an hour, people flocked to the table to talk about their fears of how the heartless Tories and their lackey's, the Liberal Democrats budget will effect them. All of the people we spoke to thought our Alternative budget was a much more sensible way to deal with the capitalist, greedy bankers crisis.

The message is clear - the public will not stand for the debt being foisted upon the poor and the ordinary working people of this country - we didn't cause this! The rich must pay for their debt!

If you didn't get the chance to sign up to our Alternative Budget - we will be in Kirkie High Street on Wednesday 14th July from 12noon onwards -so come along!

Read our alternative in our special edition of the Scottish Socialist Voice. Click on image below. (also - scroll down for local edition of Voice)



More on our main website HERE

Thursday, 1 July 2010

The economic situation

by Campbell Martin (from www.the3towns.com )

Let’s get one thing straight, we are not ‘all in this together’.

We, that is ‘us’, the ordinary, working-class people of the country, did not benefit from the obscene profits generated by bankers and financial speculators when they were having their ‘good times’ from gambling with our money, but suddenly ‘we’ are included when they can’t pay their debts and need a bail-out.

The massive debts accrued by the spivs and speculators of the City of London were cleared by the previous New Labour Government by borrowing billions-of-pounds against our names. We did not run-up the debts, but we paid them - and we could only afford to pay them by borrowing the money, which we will have to pay back, with interest.

Were you consulted at all about the action taken by the Labour Government? I know I wasn’t. No, none of ‘us’, the ordinary people, were consulted. We were just told it was necessary.

We were told by Gordon Brown and Alastair Darling that the debts of the Capitalist financial speculators had to be cleared or the banks would have collapsed. They told us that we came close to the nightmare scenario where cash-machines would have declined our cards and we would not have been able to access money in our accounts because the High Street banks would have been ‘bankrupt’.

That story is very similar to the garbage trotted out by pro-nuclear politicians. Their lie is that we need more nuclear power stations to ‘stop the lights going out like they did in California’.

Now, there are two points to be made regarding that scare story: firstly, when full life-cycle costs are taken into consideration, nuclear is the most expensive way of generating energy. It is so expensive that no company within the nuclear industry has any plans to build new stations in the UK. Of course, if the government - that is ‘us’, the ordinary people - were to pay the astronomical costs of building new nuclear stations, then private companies, like British Energy, would be happy to run them and skim-off their profit. That is, so long as the government - that’s right, ‘us’, the ordinary people - continue to pick-up the multi-million pound tab for cleaning up nuclear sites at the end of their life-spans, and dealing with the toxic waste the industry generates.

The second point about the threat of ‘the lights going out’, like they did in California, is that the cause of that particular electricity failure had nothing to do with a lack of supply, and everything to do with cost.

Like most things in the USA, electricity generation and supply is in the hands of private companies. In California the private companies that generate electricity hiked up their prices to such an extent that the private companies who supply the electricity to domestic users refused to buy ‘the product’. There was plenty of electricity, it was just that private companies were doing what they always do and were attempting to exploit a situation to maximise their profits at the expense of the ordinary people.

Despite the fact the Californian lights went out for no other reason than the greed of Capitalists running private companies, we are still sold the scare story that such an event could be repeated here if we don’t agree to pay for, and build, new nuclear power stations. Of course, if we were stupid enough to fall for that scare story, then the new power stations would be run for us by Capitalist private companies, who would look to maximise their profits at our expense.

The story about the Labour Government having to bail-out the spivs and speculators of the big financial institutions, in order to stop High Street banks closing and us not being able to withdraw a few pounds from the ‘hole in the wall’, is just as much garbage.

Banks could have been ‘saved’ by taking them into public ownership. In other words, they could have been ‘nationalised’. In doing this, the government could have made clear that what was being nationalised was the core functions of the banks - savers accounts, main-home mortgages, personal and business loans and so on. In addition, it could have been made clear that debts accrued from financial speculation on the part of the private banking companies would not be covered. Banks could have been ‘saved’ without the ordinary working class people of this country becoming responsible for the repayment of billions-of-pounds of debt amassed by a very few greedy Capitalists.

That could have happened, but it didn’t - and the reason it didn’t, is because all of the mainstream political parties in this country support the Capitalist system. We, the people, bailed them out, we paid their debts, and they have gone straight back to their old ways. The same people who caused the current economic crisis are still in place, they are still operating the Capitalist system, they are still taking home salaries that read like a Lottery winner’s cheque, and they are still paying themselves obscenely massive bonuses.

Last Tuesday, the first Budget of the Tory-Lib Dem coalition Government introduced a range of measures that will result in hundreds-of-thousands of job losses amongst the ordinary, working-class people of this country. We are in for savage cuts to public services. We will have to pay more tax, including VAT, which has been raised to 20-percent. VAT is a regressive tax, it hits the poorest hardest, so yet again it is the ordinary, working-class people who are footing the bill for Capitalist profligacy.

Capitalism caused the misery so many ordinary people are now enduring - and of which so many more will feel the force as the government’s austerity measures kick-in - and yet we are told there is no alternative. We are told Capitalism is the only game in town and we just have to brace ourselves, get on with things and wait for the next financial catastrophe - the history of Capitalism is littered with them.

However, that is not the case. There is a viable alternative, one where the interests of the ordinary people are put first, rather than those of a small ruling elite. That alternative is called Socialism.

Let’s briefly look at a few alternative measures that a Socialist government could have introduced:

Income Tax - £17.2bn could be raised by taxing all income over £100,000 per year at 50-percent, with a further £9.1bn raised by removing the caps and restrictions on NI contributions. Marginal increases in income tax would generate a total of £26.3bn per year in additional income for government. If combined with more stringent tax avoidance measures it would be possible to raise much more than this from those in society with the highest incomes.

Corporation Tax - this has been halved over the last 30 years from 56-percent to 28-percent. By taking it back to 56-percent, it would be possible to generate additional revenues of £42bn per year. An International Financial Transactions Tax to reduce currency speculation would bring in an estimated £4.2bn per year.

Tax Avoidance - Various estimates from HMRC, the Guardian, TUC and the Treasury have suggested that a concerted effort to reduce tax avoidance would secure around £20bn a year, while the Tax Justice Network has calculated that in recent years some £120bn of tax has been avoided. This is money that has effectively been fraudulently taken from the people by big business.

Reducing Public Spending - Measures could include cancelling the replacement for the Trident Nuclear Missile System, saving around £76bn, and immediately bringing home British forces serving abroad. Meanwhile, Ministry of Defence workers could be provided with alternative sources of employment that would serve the interests of the people here in Scotland, rather than supporting imperialist wars abroad. The Scottish Trades Union Congress has recently set out how such a strategy applied to the replacement of Trident would create far more jobs elsewhere in the economy. Then there is PPP/PFI spending, an issue close to our hearts here in North Ayrshire, with the local Council’s £380m project to build and maintain just four schools. Returning PPP/PFI projects to the public sector would save around £3.3bn per annum.

Welfare and Pensions - People should not have to ‘prove they are poor’ in order to receive benefits, as currently happens with means-testing. Benefits and Pensions should be part of a universal system, with progressive taxation recouping any payments made to those whose incomes from other sources mean they don’t need additional support.

Debt Repayment - A full programme of Socialist policies applied to Scotland’s current economic situation would generate a budget surplus of around £10bn, which could be used to repay debt.

It hasn’t been possible in an article like this to go into detail about how Socialism would create a fairer society, where the interests of the people are what motivates and drives government policies. However, a viable alternative to the Capitalist system that has caused the problems we now face is available. Of course, you won’t hear much about it. The Capitalists own the media and it isn’t in their interests for you to know about the alternative.

Incidentally, I have to be honest, the alternative budget proposals listed above were not my own. They form part of the reasoned policies brought forward by the Scottish Socialist Party in response to the ‘slash and burn’ Budget of the Tory-Lib Dem Government. In much of the Capitalist-owned media, if they mention the Scottish Socialist Party at all it is only to brand them as ‘the loony left’. In fact, the policies of the SSP are very reasonable and would benefit the vast majority of Scots. Meanwhile, the Capitalist lunatics are still in charge of the asylum.

Tuesday, 22 June 2010

The poor will pay... SSP on today's disasterous Budget...

SSP publish Alternative to Budget HERE
LEFT BANKER Raphie de Santos response to Budget HERE
SSP Union organiser on Union response to cuts HERE
Join the resistance to public spending cuts HERE
Main Scottish Teaching Union backs fight against cuts HERE