Her opportunity to ask something worthwhile and pertinent to East Dunbartonshire came up towards the end of the Cleggeron’s session on Tuesday 27 July.
It annoyed me. I will leave it up to you whether you feel her contribution and opportunity to ask something the Cleggeron could have made a difference in our constituency.
Let’s look at her very recent record.
Education is a devolved issue, that is, all decisions about Scottish Education are taken by Scottish MSP’s. In Scotland we have 11 new Tory, I mean “Liberal Democrat” MP’s – all supporting Tory policies Scotland irrefutably and overwhelmingly rejected. All of these MP’s, with the exception of two - Malcolm Bruce and Charles Kennedy – voted for the new Education legislation that will take money from deprived schools and give it to schools in already well off areas. It will give this and any future education secretary, in England, unprecedented powers, exercisable without reference to any elected body. "Independent" academies and "free" parent-led schools are, of course, wholly dependent on the secretary of state for their annual grants and solely accountable to him. So they may find it prudent not to annoy him.
The untrammelled concentration of power in the hands of a single government minister was what the Butler Education Act of 1944, now effectively dismantled in a couple of days, was careful to avoid. The Liberal Democrat leadership in the Commons has been complicit in allowing this. (see http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/jul/28/learning-curve-on-academies-bill for further arguments. This particular argument is from Peter Newsam).
Swinson was one of those who handed over unprecedented power to the Tory Gove, much to the ire of many Liberal Democrat voters in England. As Swinson has said herself, any legislation passed in England CAN be imposed on Scotland (see her closing remarks in this interview with Andrew Marr http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/sunday_am/4960004.stm )
Swinson is using her time down in Westminster to justify the work of the Tories - and to waste time during Questions both Prime Minister and Deputy. She has been used as a patsy to remove left Liberal leaders in the past AND to remove the former Speaker of the House - one of the events planned by the tories to undermine the Labour administration and legitimise their own non-policy before the election in order to impose an idealogical sweep of our Welfare State. The further legitimisation of the Tories comes from the Liberal Party support and of course, in the cover of the ecomomic crisis caused by the bankers and rich gamblers in the worlds stock markets. This cover means the Tories can do what ever the hell they like all in the name of "needed cuts and savings", when, as we know full well, the cuts they propose are unnecessary (see our proposals on our main website)
This week I have met two supply teachers in Bearsden who are putting their houses on the market as they cannot get work next term. I know of other people living close to me who have put their houses on the market because they have lost an income because of Tory cuts in various departments in the Public Services that have been supported by the Liberal Democrats and Jo Swinson.
I tweeted questions Swinson COULD have asked, rather than the question she did – one she already knew the answer to.
I also tweeted -
The cost of having @joswinson asking questions she already knows the answers to is the equivalent of 3 newly qualified teachers. I met a colleague from #eastdunbartonshire yesterday having to sell her family home because of cutbacks in education.
- The cost being based on her salary and not including her expenses.
These are my examples. If you wish to tweet her she can be found on
Questions @joswinson could have asked:Will the govt step in to stop the deportation of an abused woman (see @glasgow4mhangos ) and daughter who will be sent back to the abusive husband in Malawi?
Questions @joswinson could have asked:As the #PM has called #gaza a prison camp, are we going to stop selling arms to #israel that are used to enforce the #palestinian entrapment?
Questions @joswinson could have asked:as more of our soldiers are sent home dead, and wikileaks showing the #us are covering up civilian losses and the fact we are losing, shouldnt we appologise and leave Afghanistan?
Questions @joswinson could have asked:as we launch the big society, should govt be stopping the closure of local halls as they are used by the very groups we want to encourage as places to come together?
Questions @joswinson could have asked:could the govt conduct a survey into how many supply teachers are unable to get work at start of school term in #eastdunbartonshire ?
Questions @joswinson could have asked:as unemployment soars in#eastdunbartonshire shouldnt we stop trident replacement and pull out of afghanistan rather than hit public services?
Questions @joswinson could have asked: why is govt anti-public health?#eastdunbartonshire looks like it will lose health facility that serves a huge area. [Cala homes plans to demolish the local leisure Centre - the Allander - before a new one is built. In effect, because of council cuts, this will mean no new facility is ever built...]
Questions @joswinson could have asked:what will govt do to help the huge teacher unemployment situation in #eastdunbartonshire?
Questions @joswinson could have asked:will there be legislation against corporations going to court again & again when councils dont grant plan permission? [This is regarding an ongoing battle with Tescos and a recent council defeat by Cala Homes]
Follow us on twitter HERE
2 comments:
Think your just a tad biased !!
The left are always going to accuse the LDs of being cover for the Tories rather than welcoming a change to Coalition Politics.
I suppose raising Personal Tax Thresholds,Raising CGT,abandoning Labour's 'prison works' approach are all classic Tory policies.
Richiedaw, I doubt if you have even convinced yourself with your attempt to cover for the ConDems attacks on the poor and the public sector.
Sure, the personal allowance before tax is paid is to increase by £1,000 (if you are under 65) but working people will face higher National Contributions and everyone will be paying far more VAT. You will almost certainly know this and it is probably just your political bias that motivates you to try to defend the indefensible by cherry-picking instead of looking at the big picture.
The facts are not really under dispute. The ConDem coalition itself has made it crystal clear that it plans to attack public services, cut wages and pensions whilst supporting big business and continuing the war in Afghanistan.
The SSP does not believe that these are the priorities of the people of Scotland and this is why we will be playing our part in actively opposing the ConDem butchers at every opportunity.
Allan
Post a Comment